nanog mailing list archives
Delayed mail [WAS: Packet anonymity is the problem?]
From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:07:16 -0400
On Apr 11, 2004, at 12:11 AM, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote: [SNIP]Interesting that I sent this on the 11th and it gets delivered on the 14th.
My reverse did not match the forward of that IP, which I just fixed. I figured that the mail was dead, but I guess it queued. Sorry for the ... strange reply timing.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem?, (continued)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Jeff Workman (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Yann Berthier (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Yann Berthier (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Henry Linneweh (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Yann Berthier (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 11)
- Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 14)
- Delayed mail [WAS: Packet anonymity is the problem?] Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 14)