nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Richard Cox wrote:
Nothing even close to that can be said of NTL. Unfortunately.
NTL put their head in the sand in the hopes their spam problem will go away. Unfortunately for NTL what will end up happening is NTL mail will go away, into global RBLs and thousands of private block lists. -Dan
Current thread:
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators), (continued)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) J.D. Falk (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 13)