nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators)
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:38:59 -0400
One has to wonder what impact it would have on AOL's bottom line if they were to release their solutions so we could all use them, thus cutting down their load as well.....
Maybe they could include the software set in the next version of WinAMP :_) DJ
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) J.D. Falk (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)