nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall () ehsco com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:20:01 -0500
On 4/12/2004 11:31 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
address are getting lost in the fray. Having our techs/engineers go through the abuse@ box every day to play hide and seek is a bit of an agonizing task that nobody really wants, especially at the volume it is
On the other hand, making me spend half an hour or more of my workday filling out forms for you just pushes the costs outside of your network and into mine. That's pretty rude, don't you think? Worse is that it's shortsighted. If everybody did this, then those reversed costs will get back to your own operation at some point. One day you'll find *yourself* spending several hours a day filling out abuse reports for other people's networks, whereas you used to be able to just forward them via email. Congratulations on raising everybody's costs, including your own.
today. If there was a standard that worked for this, we would certainly follow it.
Standardized scripts would also be abused. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Current thread:
- abuse standards & consumer reports, (continued)
- abuse standards & consumer reports William Allen Simpson (Apr 11)
- Re: abuse standards & consumer reports Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 11)
- Re: Lazy network operators Avleen Vig (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)