nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 11 Apr 2004 03:41:48 +0000
sean () donelan com (Sean Donelan) writes:
Should anonymous use of the Internet be eliminated so all forms of abuse can be tracked and dealt with?
of course not. however, anonymity should be brokered by trusted doubleblinds; nonbrokered/nontrusted anonymity without recourse by recipients is right out. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse, (continued)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 12)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Niels Bakker (Apr 12)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 14)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 14)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- abuse standards & consumer reports William Allen Simpson (Apr 11)
- Re: abuse standards & consumer reports Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 11)
- Re: Lazy network operators Avleen Vig (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)