nanog mailing list archives
RE: Spam with no purpose?
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:35:10 -0800
Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote: What would happen if an ISP's mail server were to collect the URLs in emails and then retrieve the URL. Wouldn't this create a lot of false positives for the spammer thus screwing with their business model?
It has to be smarter; this would not reproduce the decay rate, for example. Would fool only beginners. Michel.
Current thread:
- Re: Mail with no purpose?, (continued)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Jonathan Nichols (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Gregory Hicks (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 02)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 04)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Chris Adams (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)