nanog mailing list archives
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt () tls msk ru>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:24:44 +0400
Haesu wrote: []
Before I figure out this BIND thing, for now.. box02jp5-cr01.twdx.net# set routing-options static route 64.94.110.11/32 discard;
Please do no do that. You, or your users, will end up having TONS of undeliverable bounces for forged/bogus domains sitting in mail spools... /mjt
Current thread:
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior, (continued)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Kandra Nygårds (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior sthaug (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Kandra Nygårds (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior William Devine, II (Sep 17)
- RE: Change to .com/.net behavior Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior John Palmer (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Petri Helenius (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Paul Vixie (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior William Devine, II (Sep 17)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Michael Tokarev (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Jared Mauch (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Jared Mauch (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Steve Gibbard (Sep 15)
- Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Mark Radabaugh (Sep 15)