nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verisign Responds

From: "Kevin Loch" <kloch () gurunet net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:26:41 -0400


Daniel Karrenberg wrote:


What else does the IETF need to do here?


Recognize the legacy status of certain zones and establish strict
criteria for making configuration changes to them.  This would
be in addition to any guidance for all zones with delegations.

KL

Current thread:

Re: Verisign Responds, (continued)
- - - Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 22)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 24)
    - RE: Verisign Responds Jeroen Massar (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Matthew Richardson (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Kevin Loch (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Crist Clark (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Vadim Antonov (Sep 23)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
    - Re: Verisign Responds Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 23)

(Thread continues...)