nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign Responds
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind, how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for all DNS? -Dan
That would be making a fundamental change to the DNS to make wildcards illegal anywhere. Is that what you want? --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign Responds, (continued)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 24)
- RE: Verisign Responds Jeroen Massar (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Matthew Richardson (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Kevin Loch (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Crist Clark (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Vadim Antonov (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Andy Walden (Sep 23)