nanog mailing list archives

Re: Pitfalls of annoucing /24s


From: Andy Ellifson <andy () ellifson com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:28:45 -0700 (PDT)


I have a /24 allocated to my by XO Communications in Phoenix, AZ
(67.X.X.0/24).  I am currently announcing it to Verio in Europe.  A
friend of mine that is an XO customer in Phoenix with BGP to XO can get
to that address block within XO's network.

But on the flip side.  I also have a /22 from AT&T (12.X.X.0/22).  When
I announce that network block to Verio in Europe (and nowhere else),
only certain places get to the Europe location.  Networks that prefer
AT&T go to AT&T's network and die since the route isn't there.  I don't
know if I am missing something but it think it may have to do with how
the network's peering/filter schemes work.

I may just be walking around the problem since I am a transit customer
of Verio and they normally filter.

-Andy



--- Phil Rosenthal <pr () isprime com> wrote:

On Oct 15, 2003, at 5:24 PM, H. Michael Smith, Jr. wrote:



What about the /24's that many ISPs (especially tier 2-3) are
assigning
to multi-homed customers?  What about an IX or "critical
infrastructure
providers" that may be issued a /24 from ARIN (Policy 2001-3)?

As long as it's provider assigned, and your provider announces the 
supernet that the /24 is from, it will still work.  If you announce
PI 
space out of the old class A space in /24's, many networks wont be
able 
to reach you.



Current thread: