nanog mailing list archives

RE: Pitfalls of annoucing /24s


From: "H. Michael Smith, Jr." <michael () awtechnologies com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:11:07 -0400


Even if they understand it, why should they accept it?  If an ISP
assigns an address block, runs BGP with the customer, promotes
multi-homing, shouldn't they make a reasonable effort to make it work?

Unless I am missing something, I am having a big problem with an ISP
assigning a /24 to a multi-homed customer and not accepting /24 routes.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
William Caban
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:44 PM
To: Jean-Christophe Smith
Cc: NANOG
Subject: RE: Pitfalls of annoucing /24s


I will say most probably yes. I have seen this "problem"(?) on many
small business customers. The hard part is trying to explain that to
them.

-William

On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:16, Jean-Christophe Smith wrote:
I noticed the verio filter policy, in relation to inbound:
 - In the traditional Class A space (i.e., 0/1), we accept /22 and
shorter.

If I want to announce a /24 in the 64.x.x.x space(traditional Class A
space)
am I'm going to have a problem with other networks that have peer
filters
similar to Verios?

Thanks,
Jean-Christophe Smith
-- 
William Caban <william () hpcf upr edu>





Current thread: