nanog mailing list archives
Re: Block all servers?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:44:20 +0300
Adam Selene wrote:
NAT is more expensive to produce, so it should be an optional premium service,By all means, make a non-NAT IP address a optional premium service, and hope those that request it are sophisticated enought to secure their machine.
and that seems to be more and more the case. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Block all servers?, (continued)
- Re: Block all servers? Kee Hinckley (Oct 14)
- Re: Block all servers? Crist Clark (Oct 14)
- Re: Block all servers? Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 14)
- Re: Block all servers? Alex Yuriev (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? ken emery (Oct 11)
- RE: Block all servers? Terry Baranski (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Petri Helenius (Oct 12)
- Re: Block all servers? Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 10)
- Re: Block all servers? Adam Selene (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Petri Helenius (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Adam Selene (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Petri Helenius (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? Petri Helenius (Oct 10)
- RE: Block all servers? Christopher Bird (Oct 11)
- Re: Block all servers? jlewis (Oct 11)
- Re: Fw: Re: Block all servers? Chris Brenton (Oct 15)
- Re: Fw: Re: Block all servers? Crist Clark (Oct 15)