nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet privacy
From: Matt Levine <matt () deliver3 com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 17:09:24 -0400
On Oct 2, 2003, at 5:01 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
<snip>I think this would be a very bad thing. If some independent organizationwants to provide that service, fine. Allowing registrars to provide itallows for the possibility of a conflict of interest if any policies evercome to fruition to allow revocation of resources for bad contact data.Think about it, if you allow the registrar (who has the ultimate obligation to pull the domain) to instead obscure their contact for a fee, then, youhave essentially eliminated any such protection.
Godaddy seems to be offering this service already - http://www.domainsbyproxy.com/
Owen
-- Matt Levine <matt () deliver3 com>"The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." -BIX
Current thread:
- Re: Internet privacy, (continued)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Leo Bicknell (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- RE: Internet privacy Jeffrey Meltzer (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Matt Levine (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Jack Bates (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Richard Cox (Oct 02)
- Re: Internet privacy Booth, Michael (ENG) (Oct 03)
- Re: Internet privacy Owen DeLong (Oct 03)