nanog mailing list archives
Re: VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...)
From: Declan McCullagh <lists () politechbot com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:43:04 -0500
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:27:06AM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
I will not participate in a VeriSign sponsored list, as that might give fodder for another "press release" claiming network operators and designers had reviewed and approved the VeriSign changes. I recommend that others only join neutral unaffiliated discussion lists.
Without taking a position on the merits of SiteFinder, I would note that VeriSign representatives mentioned their mailing list today at the meeting in Washington, DC as evidence that close collaboration with the Internet community was in progress and that any technical problems it caused could be solved (once SiteFinder is back online, they meant). -Declan
Current thread:
- sitefinder technical discussions Mark Kosters (Oct 06)
- Re: sitefinder technical discussions Alex Rubenstein (Oct 06)
- Re: sitefinder technical discussions Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 07)
- VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...) William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...) Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 07)
- Re: VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...) Declan McCullagh (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sitefinder technical discussions Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: sitefinder technical discussions Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)