nanog mailing list archives
RE: VeriSign Capitulates
From: JC Dill <nanog () vo cnchost com>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:53:04 -0700
At 07:17 AM 10/4/2003, St. Clair, James wrote:
I would add that what you perceive as a "diverse group" is still a realtively small sub-set of all the internet operations.
Be that as it may, this group is *anything* but "close knit". This is as unified as I've seen nanog participants on any matter (technical or otherwise) over the years that I've been on nanog. That alone speaks volumes about the "technical community's general opinion" of Verisign's actions in this matter.
jc
Current thread:
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates, (continued)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates David G. Andersen (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Allen McRay (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Haesu (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Kevin Loch (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 03)
- verisign lawsuits need data on "core operation" and "stability" William Allen Simpson (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Jared Mauch (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates E.B. Dreger (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates St. Clair, James (Oct 04)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates JC Dill (Oct 04)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Will Yardley (Oct 04)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Michael . Dillon (Oct 06)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 06)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 06)