nanog mailing list archives
RE: VeriSign Capitulates
From: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair () vredenburg com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:17:10 -0400
I would add that what you perceive as a "diverse group" is still a realtively small sub-set of all the internet operations. As Owen points out, the unstated message is a group of "geeks behind the scene" (my words) ended something the great Verisign was doing for the benefit of all netizens. Shame on you.. :-) -----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong To: Allen McRay; nanog () merit edu Sent: 10/3/2003 5:47 PM Subject: RE: VeriSign Capitulates Verisign press releases have never been about the facts. Instead it's about trying to manipulate public perception to their side. Verisign has never expressed any actual concern or even care about how much damage their actions do to the internet. Any expectation that this would change in this circumstance is an act of optimism or stupidity. I only hope that the press in question will be made aware of the truth of these matters and publish that information. Otherwise, you may be faced with a situation where the DOC asks ICANN why they caved to such a small special interest group's pressure. Owen --On Friday, October 3, 2003 15:43 -0500 Allen McRay <amcray () amcray net> wrote:
Outside of one other person on this list, I know no one else
personally,
so where do they come up with the "close-knit" stuff? I thought that most of the traffic I have monitored, re: this topic, has come from a very diverse and rather large group of people from all around the
world
who have been trying to say is that what VeriSign has done has caused problems in their area of expertise, in their businesses, and for the public in general. Also seen a lot of proof posted along with the comments..... I might also mention, I understand the technology "underpinning" the internet.... it's the attempted abuse of power by individuals and organizations like VeriSign that I can't go along with.... AllenVeriSign also angered the close-knit group of engineers and
scientists
who are familiar with the technology underpinning the Internet.
They
say that Site Finder undermines the worldwide Domain Name System, causing e-mail systems, spam-blocking technology and other applications to malfunction.
Current thread:
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates, (continued)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates Petri Helenius (Oct 03)
- Re: Does anyone think it was a good thing ? (was Re: VeriSign Capitulates David G. Andersen (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Allen McRay (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Haesu (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Kevin Loch (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 03)
- verisign lawsuits need data on "core operation" and "stability" William Allen Simpson (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Jared Mauch (Oct 03)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates E.B. Dreger (Oct 03)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates St. Clair, James (Oct 04)
- RE: VeriSign Capitulates JC Dill (Oct 04)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Will Yardley (Oct 04)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Michael . Dillon (Oct 06)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 06)
- Re: VeriSign Capitulates Owen DeLong (Oct 06)