nanog mailing list archives
RE: OT: BGP questions
From: "Pete Templin" <pete.templin () texlink com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:22:26 -0600
It's not a dispute, it's a dollar$ decision on behalf of Sprint and/or MFN. "Hmmm, I'm getting paid by 6939 but not by 3356. I'll send my traffic through 6939 by increasing my local preference to them." Pete Templin Senior Staff Engineer TexLink Communications (210) 892-4183 pete.templin () texlink com -----Original Message----- From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork () inch com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:24 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: OT: BGP questions
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Charles Sprickman wrote:(just look at AS8059, which is still sucking down most traffic via 6939 rather than 3356, even with all that silly prepending)...
Found an interesting one. Sprint no longer has a "full" looking glass, just this: http://oxide.sprintlink.net/cgi-bin/glass.pl But it shows Sprint reaching 8059 via MFN, even with the prepends. Is there a Sprint/Level3 peering dispute that I'm not aware of? Might someone from Sprint comment on this privately? Thanks, Charles
Current thread:
- OT: BGP questions Charles Sprickman (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: BGP questions Charles Sprickman (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: BGP questions Charles Sprickman (Nov 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT: BGP questions Per Gregers Bilse (Nov 15)
- RE: OT: BGP questions Pete Templin (Nov 19)
- Re: OT: BGP questions Charles Sprickman (Nov 15)