nanog mailing list archives

RE: OT: BGP questions


From: "Pete Templin" <pete.templin () texlink com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:22:26 -0600


It's not a dispute, it's a dollar$ decision on behalf of Sprint and/or MFN.

"Hmmm, I'm getting paid by 6939 but not by 3356.  I'll send my traffic through 6939 by increasing my local preference 
to them."

Pete Templin
Senior Staff Engineer
TexLink Communications
(210) 892-4183
pete.templin () texlink com


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork () inch com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:24 AM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: OT: BGP questions


On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Charles Sprickman wrote:

(just look at AS8059, which is still sucking down most traffic via 6939
rather than 3356, even with all that silly prepending)...

Found an interesting one.  Sprint no longer has a "full" looking glass,
just this:

http://oxide.sprintlink.net/cgi-bin/glass.pl

But it shows Sprint reaching 8059 via MFN, even with the prepends.  Is
there a Sprint/Level3 peering dispute that I'm not aware of?  Might
someone from Sprint comment on this privately?

Thanks,

Charles


Current thread: