nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re[3]: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons?


From: "Scott Granados" <scott () wworks net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 12:01:52 -0700


I spoke to a Mr. Fagundo from the co.la.ca.us some sort of intermediary
computing center and he indicated that the block was properly identified in
its original form as it appears now.

Not sure but his return telephone number where I called him was infact at
this computing center so I suspect its valid.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <william () elan net>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: Re[3]: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is
announcing bogons?



Just checked and it appears ARIN reacted quickly and updated whois info
for 170.208.0.0/16, I think they put back info that was there before.
I do hope they will get in touch with right people and update the block
with new info soon.

[whois.arin.net]

OrgName:    ISD
OrgID:      ISD-1
Address:    9150 E. Imperial Hwy
City:       Downey
StateProv:  CA
PostalCode: 90242
Country:    US

NetRange:   170.208.0.0 - 170.208.255.255
CIDR:       170.208.0.0/16
NetName:    LANET-1
NetHandle:  NET-170-208-0-0-1
Parent:     NET-170-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Assignment
Comment:
RegDate:    1995-01-05
Updated:    2003-05-01

TechHandle: DS127-ARIN
TechName:   Shelley, Dennis
TechPhone:  +1-310-940-2224
TechEmail:

OrgTechHandle: DS127-ARIN
OrgTechName:   Shelley, Dennis
OrgTechPhone:  +1-310-940-2224
OrgTechEmail:

On Sat, 3 May 2003, Richard Cox wrote:


On 3 May 2003 01:18 UTC Emil Kacperski <emil () atrivo com> wrote:

| Officially I am declaring surrender and victory to
| the people that have chosen to cause so much harm.

Currently I am still seeing your routes being announced via NLayer.

In view of all the information provided to you here, I am amazed that
you continued to announce IP ranges which you now know are not yours.

| Hopefully Atrivo and myself are not blacklisted in this group,
| since we caused nobody any harm.

People will of course make up their minds individually as to whether
what you did caused harm.  You may assist them greatly in coming to
their decisions, by answering the following questions truthfully:

[1] who precisely was it that you claim gave or sold you the
rights to use the netblock 170.208.0.0/16?
[2] who initially entered your details - including your contact
e-mail address - against that netblock on ARIN's database?






Current thread: