nanog mailing list archives
Re: European equivalent of Equinix?
From: Fearghas McKay <fm-lists () st-kilda org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:41:58 +0100
At 15:34 +0100 20/5/03, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Hmm eg KPNQ just turned off when the receivers walked in... and you could not remove your property until they gave it the all clear some weeks later...
The administrators were probably concerned with ensuring that they had identified who owned what, I would imagine a similar scenario in Ch 11 actions. However my understanding is that when the KPN administrators walked in they kept the business running for as long as possible, certainly in the Netherlands they were routing packets for a few weeks after they were appointed, I don't know about the data centres, but they did not just switch everything off as soon as they arrived. f
Current thread:
- European equivalent of Equinix? Steve Francis (May 19)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Paul Vixie (May 19)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Frank Louwers (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Lars Erik Gullerud (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Subhi S Hashwa (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Frank Louwers (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Fearghas McKay (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Fearghas McKay (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 20)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Bill Woodcock (May 27)
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Niels Bakker (May 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: European equivalent of Equinix? Wouter van Hulten (May 20)