nanog mailing list archives
Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering]
From: Guy Tal <guy () gblx net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:38:50 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Hmm is the first bit optional? ;) Okay again I perhaps wasnt specific enough, I'm suggesting the MEDs and communities are useful between two peers who may be peering at multiple points, so this is engineering choices when the two paths are identical and all you have is the entry/exit point to choose. Steve
The first bit definitely wasn't RFC compliant and is probably not AUP compliant either. :/ But on to more serious matters, you just have to be very careful that your policy is implemented uniformly. And don't forget that there are other factors that are examined before MED is looked at. Guy
Current thread:
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering], (continued)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Jay Ford (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Danny McPherson (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Stephen J. Wilcox (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Danny McPherson (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Richard A Steenbergen (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Guy Tal (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Danny McPherson (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Danny McPherson (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Stephen J. Wilcox (May 16)
- Re: Communities BCP [was: RE: BGP Path Filtering] Guy Tal (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Leo Bicknell (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Sean Donelan (May 16)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Joe Abley (May 17)
- Re: BGP Path Filtering Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 17)