nanog mailing list archives

Re: identity theft != spam

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 19:39:16 +0200

on the positive side, it's clear from the spam summit a week ago that the
FTC has done the math and understands what the score is, and is being as
agressive as their budget and their mandate from congress allows.

unfortunately, until proper legislation is passed, they are to some degree
hamstrung by said mandate from congress.


ack

randy

Current thread:

identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Richard Welty (May 15)
  - Re[2]: identity theft != spam Richard Welty (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam John Payne (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Daniel Golding (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Horry (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: identity theft != spam Chris Woodfield (May 15)
  - Re: identity theft != spam Charles Sprickman (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Vadim Antonov (May 15)
    - Re: identity theft != spam Peter Galbavy (May 16)
    - Re: identity theft != spam steve uurtamo (May 16)

(Thread continues...)