nanog mailing list archives

Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries


From: Haesu <haesu () towardex com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:02:18 -0400


lol either they deliberately announce rfc1918 via network 10.0.0.0 or redisting igp into bgp... 

priceless.

-hc 

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:20:30PM -0400, McBurnett, Jim wrote:

guys.. I have a thought...
I am a charter fiber customer.. 
AND they use lots of 1918 address for management even some customer links.
I have seen this on all the cable providers..
unlike Sprint/MCI/ATT they don't use 100% RW on all their equipment..

then they leak because the BGP is not filtering properly..



-----Original Message-----
From: John Brown [mailto:jmbrown () chagresventures com]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:55 AM
To: Roland Verlander
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries




Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?

because there are lots of cable and DSL users in those
prefix's

My cable at home is net-65


-- 
Sincerely,
  Haesu C.
  TowardEX Technologies, Inc
  WWW: http://www.towardex.com
  E-mail: haesu () towardex com
  Cell: (978) 394-2867


Current thread: