nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
From: Haesu <haesu () towardex com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:02:18 -0400
lol either they deliberately announce rfc1918 via network 10.0.0.0 or redisting igp into bgp... priceless. -hc On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:20:30PM -0400, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
guys.. I have a thought... I am a charter fiber customer.. AND they use lots of 1918 address for management even some customer links. I have seen this on all the cable providers.. unlike Sprint/MCI/ATT they don't use 100% RW on all their equipment.. then they leak because the BGP is not filtering properly.. -----Original Message----- From: John Brown [mailto:jmbrown () chagresventures com] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:55 AM To: Roland Verlander Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queriesWhy does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?because there are lots of cable and DSL users in those prefix's My cable at home is net-65
-- Sincerely, Haesu C. TowardEX Technologies, Inc WWW: http://www.towardex.com E-mail: haesu () towardex com Cell: (978) 394-2867
Current thread:
- Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Justin Shore (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Haesu (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 02)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)