nanog mailing list archives
RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett () msmgmt com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 21:20:30 -0400
guys.. I have a thought... I am a charter fiber customer.. AND they use lots of 1918 address for management even some customer links. I have seen this on all the cable providers.. unlike Sprint/MCI/ATT they don't use 100% RW on all their equipment.. then they leak because the BGP is not filtering properly.. -----Original Message----- From: John Brown [mailto:jmbrown () chagresventures com] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:55 AM To: Roland Verlander Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?
because there are lots of cable and DSL users in those prefix's My cable at home is net-65
Current thread:
- Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Justin Shore (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Haesu (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 02)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)