nanog mailing list archives
Re: att.net email issues?
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 20:09:20 -0600
Once upon a time, Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> said:
I'm hoping that more large ISP's will make valid reverses a requirement. Everyone will conform to meet what the largest user bases require and allow the smaller guys who want to revamp able to safely do so. This is the standard premise for any form of migration. Can anyone get aol to enforce it, please?
It is funny that AT&T is doing this - we recently had a connection to AT&T installed and repeatedly asked for reverse DNS on the interface IPs (so traceroute would "look nice" for example), and it was never done. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- RE: att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- RE: att.net email issues? Andy Dills (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? kai (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? just me (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Sean Donelan (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Jack Bates (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re[2]: att.net email issues? Richard Welty (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? kai (Jan 27)
- Re: att.net email issues? just me (Jan 27)
- RE: att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: att.net email issues? Jack McCarthy (Jan 24)