nanog mailing list archives
Re: att.net email issues?
From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:03:07 -0600
From: "Sean Donelan" <snip>
Doesn't anyone else find it funny when people scream that ISPs should block ports and shoot people with misconfigured systems; yet when an ISP actually does enforce even a modest requirement; people start screaming how unfair or stupid that ISP is for doing that.
I'm hoping that more large ISP's will make valid reverses a requirement. Everyone will conform to meet what the largest user bases require and allow the smaller guys who want to revamp able to safely do so. This is the standard premise for any form of migration. Can anyone get aol to enforce it, please? Jack Bates Network Engineer BrightNet Oklahoma
Current thread:
- att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- RE: att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- RE: att.net email issues? Andy Dills (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? kai (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? just me (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Sean Donelan (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Jack Bates (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re[2]: att.net email issues? Richard Welty (Jan 24)
- Re: att.net email issues? kai (Jan 27)
- Re: att.net email issues? just me (Jan 27)
- RE: att.net email issues? Jim Popovitch (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: att.net email issues? Jack McCarthy (Jan 24)