nanog mailing list archives

Re: COM/NET informational message

From: brandon () rd bbc co uk (Brandon Butterworth)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:24:02 GMT

Am I the only one that finds this perversion of the DNS protocol
abhorrent and scary?


Sounds like a fine interweb kludge

It'll just be annoying until other applications aquire similar
bodgery as the users will not understand why they can't use it
for mail and all 

brandon

Current thread:

Re: COM/NET informational message, (continued)
- Re: COM/NET informational message just me (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message Marc Slemko (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message Mike (meuon) Harrison (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message bert hubert (Jan 03)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Leo Bicknell (Jan 04)
- Re: COM/NET informational message bdragon (Jan 04)
- Re: COM/NET informational message E.B. Dreger (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message bert hubert (Jan 03)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message E.B. Dreger (Jan 03)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Brandon Butterworth (Jan 03)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message Daniel Senie (Jan 03)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Joel Rowbottom (Jan 06)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Steve Dyer (Jan 07)
- Re: COM/NET informational message Joel Rowbottom (Jan 07)
  - Re: COM/NET informational message Neil J. McRae (Jan 07)
    - Re: COM/NET informational message Joel Rowbottom (Jan 07)
    - Re: COM/NET informational message Neil J. McRae (Jan 08)