nanog mailing list archives
Re: Trends in network operator security
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:45:47 -0500 (EST)
Unnamed Administration sources reported that John Fraizer said:
Does anyone know the answers to the following: (1) Why was this datacenter unmanned?
Why are CO's unmanned Saturday nights? ISP's? Could the cost of manpower having anything to do with it?
(2) If it was manned, how did the perps get physical access to steal the drives?
Once in the building, one article mentioned they'd found an access card to the machine room in a PHB's office. No PINs?
(3) Has the contractor been removed from the list of authorized vendors? (4) If not, why on earth NOT?
The vender peddles aspirin, not data services. You propose to now deny those 500K families medical care, after raping their privacy? -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 08)
- Re: Trends in network operator security batz (Jan 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security David Lesher (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Richard Irving (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security David Lesher (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 09)