nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers
From: Bruce Robertson <bruce () greatbasin net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:09:17 -0800
We switched to BGP just recently, before things got out of hand. I highly recommend that you do so. It really does work better. It's very nice seeing your OSPF config carry essentially just the loopback interfaces.
In particular I'm wondering about the thousands of lines of configuration used to make static routes work.
You don't say whether you're using Cisco, but recent IOSes have no trouble with huge configurations. You may have to use 'service compress-config'. -- Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-775-348-7299 Great Basin Internet Services, Inc. fax: +1-775-348-9412 http://www.greatbasin.net
Current thread:
- routing between provider edge and CPE routers Mike Bernico (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Bruce Robertson (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Petri Helenius (Jan 30)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Vadim Antonov (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Serge Maskalik (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Mike Bernico (Jan 29)
- RE: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Mike Bernico (Jan 29)
- RE: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Vadim Antonov (Jan 29)
- RE: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Ray Burkholder (Jan 29)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 30)
- Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers Bruce Robertson (Jan 29)