nanog mailing list archives
Re: Remote email access
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:59:40 -0800
Al, Tuesday, February 4, 2003, 10:20:50 AM, you wrote: AR> Don't even need that. I can telnet into the appropriate server/port 1. as you note, that is a solution that does not scale to millions of non-technical users. 2. many people need access from their laptops (ie, their "office), rather than having all their mail accessible over the Internet, only accessible when online. AR> Open<->Secure, choose your business plan carefully. Good Luck. The issue is not about losing "openness" but about losing interoperability. There is no technical reason high quality interoperability prevents high quality security, or at least acceptable authentication (accountability). d/ -- Dave <mailto:dcrocker () brandenburg com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850
Current thread:
- Re: Remote email access, (continued)
- Re: Remote email access Dave Crocker (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Dave Crocker (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access E.B. Dreger (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access David Lesher (Feb 04)
- RE: Remote email access Al Rowland (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access David Lesher (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Dave Crocker (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Andy Walden (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access John R Levine (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Dave Crocker (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access John R Levine (Feb 04)
- Re: Remote email access Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: Remote email access Jeff S Wheeler (Feb 05)