nanog mailing list archives
RE: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters
From: "Sameer R. Manek" <manek () ecst csuchico edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:58:16 -0800
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Todd A. Blank We were an early user of the 69/8 address space. I started the original thread on this subject back in Sept/Oct 2002. While I am very disturbed (but not surprised) to find out that there are still serious issues with networks acknowledging this allocation, this is one of the best suggestions I have seen for doing something to force the issue.
Filters once in place are rarely removed, unless the maintainers of the filters are notified about a specific problem. Even then the filters never completely go away. There is always a device or two in everyone's network that have been forgotten about, with outdated filters. Sameer
Current thread:
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters, (continued)
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters jlewis (Feb 25)
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters Haesu (Feb 25)
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters jlewis (Feb 25)
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters Haesu (Feb 25)
- Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters E.B. Dreger (Feb 25)
- why /8 announments are bad... bmanning (Feb 26)
- RE: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters Sameer R. Manek (Feb 26)
- RE: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters Scott Granados (Feb 26)