nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Selfish Routing"
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 07:14:06 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
Abstractions and analogies aside, is this really a problem, and is it really worth solving? Sounds like a lot of additional complexity for the supposed benefits.
When I read the article I didnt recognize anything in it that correlated with my understanding as to how BGP et all works. Am I the only one who after reading it thought the author needs to cut back on whatever drugs he is taking? I have never seen any router "send test packets and time them" nor take congestion into account when doing routing decisions? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- "Selfish Routing" Pete Kruckenberg (Feb 14)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Stephen Sprunk (Feb 14)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Sean Finn (Feb 14)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Stephen Sprunk (Feb 14)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Mike Lloyd (Feb 15)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 15)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Mike Lloyd (Feb 15)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Stephen Sprunk (Feb 14)
- Re: "Selfish Routing" Stephen Sprunk (Feb 14)