nanog mailing list archives
RE: VoIP QOS best practices
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:34:14 -0800 (PST)
> QoS isn't necessarily about throwing packets away. It is more like > making voice packets 'go to the head of the line'. Of course, if you > have saturation, some packets will get dropped, but at least the voice > packets won't get dropped since they were prioritized higher. Why bother? It's a pain in the ass, and doesn't give any noticable benefit. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices, (continued)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Aditya (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Sprickman (Feb 11)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices John Todd (Feb 11)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Steve Feldman (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Alec H. Peterson (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Feb 10)