nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email)
From: Christopher Chin <cchin () ack Berkeley EDU>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Today at 18:38 (+0100), Dan Houghton wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:38:43 +0100 From: Dan Houghton <dan () houghton org uk> To: Christopher Chin <cchin () ack Berkeley EDU> Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email) [. . .] IP in question is in use by a Netscalibur UK customer. The RIPE whois record for the IP provides the abuse@ contact details (which is staffed and dealt with correctly) but also noticed you emailed onto noc () netscalibur co uk as well. I'll make sure that the NOC staff deal with it and get these stopped.
Thanks for the quick response, Dan. It's great to hear that you have alert folks on the other end of both abuse@ and noc@ roles. As with most organizations, we have a fair amount of overlap between queries that arrive at abuse@, security@, and noc@, but we tend to handle operational issues via noc, and abuse@ is mostly for questionable behavior (intentional or otherwise) by our local users. With that in mind, I figured noc@netscalibur would be the more appropriate address. Please do let me know (offline is OK too) if that is not your preference. Thanks, - Christopher
Current thread:
- Hijacked email Jack.W.Parks (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Pascal Gloor (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email jlewis (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Omachonu Ogali (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Richard Irving (Aug 20)
- Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email) Christopher Chin (Aug 20)
- Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email) just me (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email jlewis (Aug 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email) Christopher Chin (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Pascal Gloor (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Will Yardley (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Will Yardley (Aug 20)
- Re: Hijacked email Mr. James W. Laferriere (Aug 20)