nanog mailing list archives
RE: Blocking port 135?
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:25:35 -0400
Im pretty sure the Shavlik products require the RPC ports for people to use HFNETCHK LE and stuff like that, and a lot of our co-lo customers use that to keep their win boxes up to date, which I think is great because that's one less abuse email I have to reply to ;-) -Drew -----Original Message----- From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:32 PM To: Sean Donelan Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan wrote:
free/cheap software firewalls that are easy and effective to use.
And breaks all kinds of nifty things which ISP has to pay for via helpdesk support. -Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking port 135?, (continued)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Justin Shore (Aug 03)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jared Mauch (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Stephen Sprunk (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Chris Johnston (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Mans Nilsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Mans Nilsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 03)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Drew Weaver (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Michel Py (Aug 02)