nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking port 135?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 01:32:45 -0400
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:46:54 +0200, Mans Nilsson said:
- Inform them that devices found to be broken into will be sent to null0 until proof of cleanliness has been obtained.
And then they download the patches how? (This is particularly a problem if the customer is using a NAT to obfuscate the IP addresses, leaving you with only one address to null0...)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking port 135?, (continued)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Crist Clark (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Justin Shore (Aug 03)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Crist Clark (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jared Mauch (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Stephen Sprunk (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Chris Johnston (Aug 01)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Mans Nilsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Mans Nilsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Sean Donelan (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Jack Bates (Aug 02)
- Re: Blocking port 135? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 03)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Drew Weaver (Aug 01)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Michel Py (Aug 02)