nanog mailing list archives

Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus


From: John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:52:28 -0500


On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:10:32 +0200
Robert Raszuk <raszuk () cisco com> wrote:

That is fine. The amount of information to be carried is easily
extensible. So if you can help us to determine the required fields we
will be more then glad to add them.

Deploying this as a signalling protocol that is separated from BGP may
make sense.  Although the ease/speed of deployment by using BGP may make
this a worthwhile effort.

John


Current thread: