nanog mailing list archives

Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:08:24 -0700


bellovin et al. have shown that the signaling protocol needs to convey
far more characterization than you propose.

randy

Current thread:

Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Sean Donelan (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jack Bates (Aug 12)
  - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Randy Bush (Aug 12)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Sean Donelan (Aug 12)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 12)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Randy Bush (Aug 12)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Robert Raszuk (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Randy Bush (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Robert Raszuk (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus John Kristoff (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Mans Nilsson (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Petri Helenius (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Måns Nilsson (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus neal rauhauser 402-301-9555 (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jason Houx (Aug 13)
    - Message not available
    - firewall == network diaper, ranting in HTML neal rauhauser 402-301-9555 (Aug 14)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 13)
    - Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Mans Nilsson (Aug 13)

(Thread continues...)