nanog mailing list archives
RE: Just a quick thought...
From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:59:13 +0200
bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
intellectual property issues? the IETF could not get change control on V8? :)
Vroooooooooooom <grin> But ford has a /8 in IPv4 so they surely would like it if the protocol carried their name too :)
I haven't had time to look, but just for my clarification, why was IPv8 not pursued further. I remember there was a discussion on
IPv6
vs IPv8 and the argument to go directly to IPv8 instead, but I had to
drop
out from following the discussions since.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers : 8 PIP The P Internet Protocol [PXF] eg: http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/ipng/ian.pip.html http://free.vlsm.org/v01/internet/ietf/00/0019.txt and more if you google around... Greets, Jeroen PS: Nooo... IPv8 and IPv16 mentioned by a certain person have nothing to do with it, even better there is no spec of those :)
Current thread:
- Just a quick thought... Jerry Eyers (Aug 01)
- RE: Just a quick thought... Lars Higham (Aug 01)
- Re: Just a quick thought... bmanning (Aug 01)
- RE: Just a quick thought... Jeroen Massar (Aug 01)