nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fun new policy at AOL
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:44:49 -0400
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:19:28 CDT, Jack Bates said:
I wouldn't recommend a policy change like that for any user base over 10,000.
So you're saying that because you've got too many users with dumb passwords, that's justification for not fixing it? ;) /Valdis (and yes, we're in the middle of a multi-month deployment of better password policies for some 40K entities, so been there, done that)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Adam Kujawski (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Ray Wong (Aug 30)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL JC Dill (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL JC Dill (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 30)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 30)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 29)