nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fun new policy at AOL
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:22:03 -0400
Then why not just pay a Virtual Mail hosting company to host a mail server for you via Imail or one of the other virtual email service packages out there. It is very inexpensive most of the time. That way you have the flexibility of having your own mail server, plus (most of the time) the server is hosted in a controlled environment (ie power, AC, network) et cetera, the benefits are endless. Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: Roland Perry [mailto:nanog () internetpolicyagency com] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:42 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Fun new policy at AOL In article <20030829162412.GA9397 () dipole informationwave net>, Omachonu Ogali <nanog () missnglnk com> writes
In which case, the telecommuters should use their organization's mail servers with SMTP authentication (yes, authentication, not pop-before-smtp).
I'm a telecommuter, I'm also a freelance, so my organisation is "me". I like the idea of running a reliable mail server with authentication, at my home base. Which is my home. I just have to get AOL not to define it as "residential". -- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL JC Dill (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 30)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 30)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 29)