nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open relays and open proxies
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:00:59 -0400
On Friday, Apr 25, 2003, at 11:57 Canada/Eastern, John Payne wrote:
Tired old argument that completely misses the "with the exception of joe jobs" clause.
Yes, maybe I'm the only person here who has no idea what that means (in which case a private mail explanation would be fine).
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Open relays and open proxies, (continued)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Christopher J. Wolff (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Daniel Senie (Apr 25)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Christopher J. Wolff (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Brian Wallingford (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Tim Wilde (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies JC Dill (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Niels Bakker (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies bdragon (Apr 26)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 27)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Nathan J. Mehl (Apr 30)