nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:07:10 -0400 (EDT)
No one said squelch. I don't see squelching on the charter for NANOG. Announce as loud as you want to. Be like other mailing lists and moderate it. Send it to the vendor first. If the vendor doesn't help you, post it. Just like they do with the abuse lists. This is operational. I doubt if you'll ever need to send anything to NANOG. ALL OF THE VENDORS WANT TO HELP YOU THE BEST THAT THEY CAN!
Wrong. None of the vendors wants to help you what so ever. What they want to do is to have you spend your money with them by claiming that they want to help you.
Wouldn't you rather have a reliable, redundant L2 core with isolated failures and fast recovery?
No. I hate complicated words and complicated concepts. It reminds me NASA spending 10M to invent a pen that writes in 0 gravity instead of using a pencil.
Ethernet is my digital wrapper of choice because of vendor chipsets supporting it and quality product.
Yeah, ethernet over what, carrier pigeons? Alex
Current thread:
- Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Bob Martinez (Sep 27)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Mike Leber (Sep 28)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Stephen Sprunk (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Bob Martinez (Sep 28)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Bob Martinez (Sep 28)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet E.B. Dreger (Sep 28)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet alex (Sep 29)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Stephen Sprunk (Sep 30)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Bob Martinez (Sep 29)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet alex (Sep 30)
- Re: Internet Core Routing - Ethernet Stephen Sprunk (Sep 30)