nanog mailing list archives

Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection


From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:21:17 +0100 (BST)



On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:


When I finally did go back to my desk to work we turned on a radio that
all of us could hear from our cube farm and tried to resume normal
operations while keeping up to date.

From a network operations perspective, anyone who has not heard William
LeFebvre's "CNN.com: Facing a World Crisis" has missed out. It talks about
how the company that hosts cnn.com handled the crises and how it affected
them from a network perspective. I've been unable to locate any decent
transcripts/recordings of this talk, but I heard it at LISA 2001.
Absolutely amazing presentation if you haven't seen it or heard it.

The company that "hosted" CNN demonstrated that for all the claims of their
connectivity, it was not really there. If I recall correctly, CNN came up when a certain company
from MA company-ized CNN.

The news coverage on Sep 11th was unprecedented, I dont believe there is any
similar incident in which the whole of the world (not just a region or
nation) has been focused on watching the news as an event unfolds.

So to be fair (I assume) CNN hadnt asked for a service that could handle that
particular load, if they had then they probably would have not been knocked off
the air.

And now we're a year on, how many news agencies have invested in a service that
can carry 1 million streams or however many they got, I doubt any so if we have
another Sep 11th type event dont expect anything to be different in the unicast
world..

Steve




Current thread: