nanog mailing list archives

block request on dalph () hush com (was Re: ISPs who de-aggregate intentionally?)


From: "John M. Brown" <john () chagresventures com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:46:54 -0700



this is an abuse of anonymous addresses and an abuse on this list.

since  the person being mocked didn't even reply to this thread, there
is certainly NO need for this twit to reply.

List Admin, please drop this person.

zero content here.  even the spam thread floods have more content
than dalph () hush com

thank you


On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:50:37PM -0700, dalph () hush com wrote:


As part of the process of making the latest BGP draft an IETF
standard, the IDR working group is in the process of reviewing how
the current draft reflects deployed code.

As part of this effort, if anyone is aware of ISPs who intentionally
de-aggregate routes and could contact me to share some of the
reasoning and their methodologies behind this, I would greatly
appreciate it.

It's great for traffic engineering.  We have two different upstreams in
two different cirites, and use it to avoid traffic on our core.  We
wanted to offer static IP dialups for roaming users, but had troubles
with /32 prefixes being filtered by the big players.

-Dalph




Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com


Current thread: