nanog mailing list archives
Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:19:20 -0400
One thing I've noticed that may be an anti-spam measure: STN, the ISP that servers Marriott hotels (among others) seems to have a "transparent" proxy intercepting outbound traffic to port 25. Not sure why they'd do that except to deter check-in spammers. They *don't* do anything with traffic to port 80, as best I can tell. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me) http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)
Current thread:
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs, (continued)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs David Lesher (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Niels Bakker (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Stephen Stuart (Sep 11)
- RE: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Al Rowland (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
- RE: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Al Rowland (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Niels Bakker (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs blitz (Sep 11)
- RE: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Al Rowland (Sep 11)