nanog mailing list archives
Re: question concerning traceroute?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:56:59 -0400
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:58:03AM -0400, alex () yuriev com wrote:
alex () yuriev com wrote:According to definition, is should take the same path, but are there any other cases that I should be aware of?According to the definition, it is going to show you the path the packets took from you to the destination, not from the destination back.Unless you did "- g",Not correct. -g specifies loose source routing on the way *there*, not back.
Alex, I think the intention was to indicate that you can traceroute -g <remote-router-before-host> <your-local-ip> to get the path to and back. -g requires an argument obviously.. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- question concerning traceroute? Darrell Carley (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Nipper, Arnold (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Jared Mauch (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? David Howe (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Nipper, Arnold (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? k claffy (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Arnold Nipper (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Sean Donelan (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: question concerning traceroute? Kris Foster (Oct 17)