nanog mailing list archives
Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:35:42 +0000 (GMT)
SD> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT) SD> From: Sean Donelan SD> Should the Service Provider version of routing software SD> include the redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, SD> I haven't seen a real-world use for redistributing the BGP SD> route table into any IGP. ! allow-dangerous bgp-into-igp allow-dangerous igp-into-bgp ! Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com> To: blacklist () brics com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Current thread:
- redistribute bgp considered harmful Sean Donelan (Oct 04)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Kevin Oberman (Oct 04)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 04)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful David Luyer (Oct 07)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 07)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 07)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful David Luyer (Oct 07)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful E.B. Dreger (Oct 04)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Nigel Taylor (Oct 04)
- Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful Joe Abley (Oct 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: redistribute bgp considered harmful Charles Youse (Oct 04)
- RE: redistribute bgp considered harmful Andrew . McConnell (Oct 04)