nanog mailing list archives

Re: PAIX

From: fkittred () gwi net
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:57:01 -0500


On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:48:17 -0800 (PST)  william () elan net wrote:

Its possible/likely that what Paul is saying may happen, but it requires 
a lot of locality-specific high-bandwidth applications (none exist now or 
in demand now) and technologies that make it possible (cost-effective) to 
manage such complex peering network for a very large network


Should be modified to say "none exists in the market in which
[william] is familiar.

regards,
fletcher

Current thread:

CW? Alex Rubenstein (Nov 13)
- PAIX David Diaz (Nov 13)
  - Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 13)
    - Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX william (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
    - Re: PAIX Michael C. Wu (Nov 23)
    - Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 23)
    - Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
    - Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 24)
    - Message not available
    - Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 24)
    - Re: PAIX E.B. Dreger (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 14)
    - Re: PAIX Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 14)

(Thread continues...)