nanog mailing list archives

Re: "portscans" (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)


From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:23:37 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)



helium:~$ whois -a 207.99.113.65
Net Access Corporation (NETBLK-NAC-NETBLK01)
   1719b Route 10E, Suite 111
   Parsippany, NJ 07054
   US

   Netname: NAC-NETBLK01
   Netblock: 207.99.0.0 - 207.99.127.255
   Maintainer: NAC

   Coordinator:
      Net Access Corporation  (ZN77-ARIN)  legal () nac net
      800-638-6336

   Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

   NS1.NAC.NET                  207.99.0.1
   NS2.NAC.NET                  207.99.0.2

   ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE

   * Reassignment information for this network is available
   * at whois.nac.net 43




On Sun, 19 May 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:


rough assessment of their network security, which was important to me
as a customer for obvious reasons.

In that case, I would not consider the scan to have come from an
'unaffiliated' person. I'm sure if the bank's network operator noticed it,
and contacted you, things would have been cleared up with no harm done. To

It sounds like you know something that I don't.  How do you find out the
contact information for someone given only an IP address?

-Ralph




-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --



Current thread: