nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interconnects
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:45:51 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
On Fri, 17 May 2002, todd glassey wrote:
Mitch what has MFN's financial problems have to do with the quality of the agreements that are in place for peering.
Easy. It fills, and then no one wants to pay to increase it. If I am not mistaken, this has happened already. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- Re: Interconnects, (continued)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen J. Wilcox (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects todd glassey (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Allan Liska (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Steven J. Sobol (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects E.B. Dreger (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects todd glassey (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 17)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Simon Lockhart (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Majdi S. Abbas (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 19)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Daniel Golding (May 22)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 23)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)